Government Shut-Down, What - Me Worry?

Well the government has shut down due to grid-lock and, like all other problems we have, it's the republicans fault. That's the version provided by the 90% democrat news media. Problem is, that version of the story is a total lie, the republicans have tried numerous times to prevent a shut-down while the democrats have been acting like ugly little spoiled brats, refusing to even talk to republicans. Besides, since when did we become so ignorant that a government shut-down could be considered a bad thing? I wish it were the case that republicans had shut down the government, that would be wonderful, and in a world where things made sense it would be of political advantage to be seen as the ones who had shut down government and the 90% democrat news media would report that democrats had done it, even the times when they had not. Some among us have become so conditioned to believe force is good that when it is withheld we panic while those of us that hate force rejoice. cjpost

Your Free Health Care Starts Today, So Pay Up

This is the day you dead beats getting the free ride have to buy your own health insurance and start paying most of mine. I tried to stop this but you would not listen. Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm old, you're young, I have 10 times the medical bills you do and forcing you to pay a big chunk of my health care costs will help me a lot and surely hurt you. Still, even though it helps me and hurts you, I do not want your help but since you voted for a man promising to take a large chunk of your ever diminishing income and forced it on me I am left with nothing to do but accept your help, you're the one that voted to remove my choice, so there's nothing I can do. Just be sure to sign up today for your free healthcare today, and yes it will cost you twice as much to get the free inferior version of what you could have had up until yesterday in a lot cheaper and superior version but we will both be a lot better off somehow, at least I will. cjpost

Calling One Likeable Usually Means He Is Not

Obama is not a likeable person, he is like most others of the socialist mold he was cut out of, wearing a smirk, nose in the air, I'm superior to you attitude. Nobody likes him, he can't get along with anyone but himself and lives his life acting like the spoiled brat on the playground that no one wants to play with so he blames them for his failures. The other idiotic democrat presidents in recent memory, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, figured out a way to compromise with the other half of the country and get some things done but Obama is such the poor little spoiled brat that he has his twin white brother Harry (cadaver) Reid block all proposals from any consideration, discussion or compromise. It is better in their view to harm the country rather than harm themselves. So for some reason those around him like to point out that he is a likeable person, but his ideas are horrible. I have noticed that most of the time when one states that another is a likeable person it is a sure sign he detests him. One sure sign of a truly likeable person is when no one has to point out that he is likeable. This likeable person designation has been overused to the absurd with this unlikeable little spoiled brat and is only used because those who refuse to play his game his way are quickly labeled racists. So, his opponents seem to think stating they like him but not his ideas or policies will let others know they are not racist, which is stupid because of another blatantly obvious paradox; When A Liberal Calls One A Racist, It Is A Sure Sign He Is Not. So ridiculous and contorted has the liberal's definition of racism become that it has been expanded to include "not agreeing with them." cjpost

The Genius of Indecisiveness, Confusion and General Stupidity

The great thing about Obama's schizophrenic foreign policy methodology is no one, including himself, has any idea what he will do. He draws red lines but when they are crossed claims he did not draw the red line but everyone else did. Secretary of State "Lurch" Kerry all but declares war on Syria but soon afterwards it becomes apparent he had not discussed this with his boss. Confused? Imagine how our adversaries must feel, how does one prepare for an attack that his enemy guaranteed that never comes? Those on the receiving end of his threats must be squirming about like Jay Carney at his daily press briefing explaining to everyone that Americans appreciate Obama's indecisiveness. No one, including our supreme leader, knows what our supreme leader, will do next, but what ever it is, no matter how contradictory or counterintuitive to common sense it is, it will be fine, because he has no idea what he is doing and we sure appreciate his indecisiveness. cjpost

Voter ID Laws Are Vital

Due to the soft bigotry of low expectations liberals fight the idea of Voter ID laws tooth and nail. It seems they prefer to steal elections but find it better to claim it would make it too hard for some people to vote and provide some of the most comically stupid reasons to support their baseless claims. They are shameless in their exploitations of minorities for personal political gain. We have countless thousands of dead people who somehow manage to vote along with countless thousands registered to vote in multiple states and counties. At the same time we are an extremely closely divided country with winners being determined by only a handful of votes in many cases. Making sure elections are done fairly is vital and far more important than making it easy for democrats to steal elections. cjpost

The "If I Had A Son Speech"

A great black leader once gave a great speech. It is called the "I have a dream" speech. Today, we have a, not so great, black leader who has given what could be called the "If I had a son" speech. "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon'" that's what he said. With these words along with whatever else he mumbled out in his convoluted reaction to a killing that no one had any facts to form a conclusion, he declared one person guilty and one person innocent, the one that looked like his son, thus spitting in the eye of the great man who gave the I have a dream speech, whose basic premise he had devoted his life to was a society that judged one another totally devoid of what one looked like. Since the door was opened by his, If I have a son speech, I wonder if in reaction to several other recent crimes we might soon hear again from our morale arbiter in like manner. For example, If he had a son, he would look like De'Marquise Elkins, he's the 18 year old black kid that shot a white baby in the face because, while robbing the white mother, she had no money to give him. Perhaps he could also say "If I had a son, he would look like James Edwards or Chancey Luna," they shot and killed a white man jogging recently because they were bored, or how about the three black kids seen on video attempting to beat a white kid to death on a school bus recently, it the president had a son, he would look like any of these three youths. Where is that speech? The first, If I had a son speech should have never been given and certainly not the ones I mention because they have no bearing on anything and mean nothing. Such things are meant to inflame passions of others into reaction based not on fact, but emotion, and that is wrong. Evil knows no color and does not consider the skin color of the vessel used to harm others and it does us no good to do so either. cjpost

Putin Appears Bored Around Obama Because He Is

At his news conference the other day, Obama said that Putin looked like a bored kid in the back of the classroom. That might possibly explain part of the reason when they are seated together for their photo ops that Putin seems to display a body language reserved only for those one has not even a hint of respect for. The other reason is that Obama is obviously seen by Putin as a tiny little insignificant gnat, a nerdish little weak man who is easily intimidated and of the variety one prefers to not be seen with because to put it bluntly, it's embarrassing. The reason Putin appears bored in the presence of Obama is because he is. cjpost

President Believes Criminal Killing Victim Is Same As Victim Killing Criminal

The president in his sermon the other day which could be titled "white man bad, black man good" told us all to consider how we would feel if the situation were reversed and Trayvon had shot Zimmerman instead of the other way around. I have quit wondering which country this poor man was born in and have been wondering lately what planet he was born on when he displays this level of ignorance. The answer to his question has been repeatedly given by myself and a multitude of others until we are blue in the face. If Trayvon noticed Zimmerman wandering around his neighborhood and decided to follow him around and keep an eye on him and Zimmerman did not like it and walked up to Trayvon and punched him in the face and proceeded to ground and pound him then Trayvon would be perfectly justified in shooting Zimmerman. I would just as quickly defend Trayvon's right to defend himself as I would Zimmerman's if the situation were reversed, which it was, so I do. We in the real world do not concern ourselves with what color two men are, we care only what the facts are. The president seems to be suggesting that if things happened as Zimmerman describes then Trayvon would have as much right to shoot Zimmerman as Zimmerman would to shoot Trayvon and this makes no sense whatsoever. Perhaps he is suggesting things did not happen the way Zimmerman describes because Zimmerman is white, not really, but sort of. This conclusion flies in the face of all the evidence and eyewitness accounts, all which agree with Zimmerman's version of events. So, with no evidence to support his conclusion, the president proceeds to act in a manner detached from fact and reality because it suits his racist agenda. cjpost

Stand For Stand Your Ground

If your state does not have a Stand-your-ground law on the books or has not adopted the Castle doctrine you should demand they do so ASAP. Despite the fact that liberals are marching in the streets demanding repeal of such laws, they are simply ignorant of the benefits of such laws. Prior to their implementation prosecutors went after people who defended themselves in their own homes and streets because they should have run away even when they could not. In Florida, blacks account for about a third of the "Stand Your Ground" claims in homicide cases which is nearly twice the black percentage of Florida's population. The majority of these claims are successful with a success rate that exceeds Florida whites. Oddly, Stand-your-ground had absolutely nothing to do with the recent Florida incident and the Zimmerman defense team never invoked it. Like everything else liberals do, if they succeed in doing what they wish, everyone will quickly wish they had not. cjpost

If Someone Who Looks Like He Could Be The President's Son Attacks You, Let Him Kill You.

I hate to tell everyone stupid enough to believe the initial news media coverage of the Florida incident, "I Told You So." Well, actually I don't. But now that the trial is over these easily brainwashed simpletons look especially stupid, able to be led around like hapless buffoons, falling for the same trick that has been played out many times before. I would be willing to bet money that the next time some white guy kills a black guy that the news media will produce a lop-sided version of events for public consumption that concludes the white guy was a murdering racist and the black guy was a helpless victim even as he sat on top of the white guy bouncing his skull on the sidewalk. Like pigs at a trough the idiots of this world eat this stuff up. Now, more than likely the president and the justice department will go after Zimmerman, charging him with some federal hate crime law. It would be too good for them to pass up. First, they are racist, Second, it would make a great distraction from the myriad of scandals which the news media would ignore as the country debated whether the feds have the right to imprison an innocent man. cjpost

Liberals Present Sins Far Worse Than Than Paula Deen's Past Sins

Once again the Racist Race Baiters (Liberals) have found another example of why the white man is rotten to his racist core. It seems Paula Deen, the flamboyant TV chef appearing on the food network drowning massively fat laden culinary creations in salt and butter while speaking in an exaggerated southern drawl, like a female version of Boss Hog, used the n-word many, many years ago, possibly a few times, who knows, memories fade. Now, of all people to get mad at, Paula Deen, possibly the most insignificant person one could find to prove a point, and not really proving anything, other than she did something a long time ago, does not do it now, and has not done it in decades, is just sad. If you are so easily offended by something someone stopped doing years ago I can only imagine how you must feel when someone does something in real time to offend you. But you know better, don't you? You are not offended at all. You are happy when someone has sinned because your identity is bound up with your brothers sin and when you have an example to hold up to prove you are offended then others sympathize with you and sympathy yields reward. And like all other scams, yours has become difficult to maintain, so scraping the bottom of the barrel is all you have left. Why Paula Deen didn't just lie and say she did not do it like the country's first black president, Bill Clinton, did when caught with his pants down (literally) is odd. A racist, after all, surely would have no problem lying one would think.  Speaking of Clinton, seems like he made some racist comments about some black guy who happens to be the president and nothing was said by the Racist Race Baiters. Perhaps had Paula Deen been a well known liberal democrat like Clinton or former clansman Robert Byrd, not only would speaking the n-word a couple times many years ago go completely unnoticed, she could have been Grand Wizard of the KKK for pete's sake and the liberals would love her. It could also be the fact that her cooking style which tended to be of the politically incorrect high-fat, massive calories method and the fact she was unashamedly southern did not help her. White southerners are racist after all and none of us are capable of eating properly without liberal guidance which just doesn't allow purchasing a sugary drink larger than 16 ounces or eating foods cooked in butter. Perhaps her apology should have included the classic "I was for it before I was against it" reference. This kind of excuse makes sense to the liberal for some unknown reason. All who have found themselves offended by the Paula Deen fiasco look ridiculous, The Food Network and all the sponsors who choose to dissociate themselves from her should be ashamed. We may now live in a country where racists define racism but it is irritating that they can not at least find someone to crucify anymore other than a loud mouth TV chef that said something offensive a long time ago and obviously does not have a racist bone in her body. There is a class of fellow citizens that suffer a far worse crime than racism and it is happening right now and it is approved and supported by the same liberals that claim to be offended by some comments someone made a long time ago. You see, I dream of that day in the future when all look back on the dark time in our nation's history when they supported abortion, also known as baby killing, and are ashamed. cjpost

Live Free (But Spied Upon) Or Die Hard

We live in a age when technology exists that enables one person to kill millions with little effort. At the same time there exists a desire by millions of psychotic serial killers operating under the guise of religious expression to to just that. Add to this reality the fact that these demented psychopaths, numbered in the millions, are willing to kill themselves to kill you and stopping them every time is impossible. Also, there is the reality that untold numbers of these mass murderers live among us right now and millions yearly travel in and out of the country from abroad, who knows how many enter daily just by walking across our unsecured border. Enter the government with their surveillance program that collects and stores all electronic communication on everyone. It is not a good thing and I don't like it more that most but until someone finds a better way to do the same thing I would agree with those that believe it is a necessary and vital part of the attempt to protect us from those whose life's goal is to kill us. CJPOST

Liberals Can Not Be Trusted To Protect Our Privacy

It should come as no surprise that this president would use the IRS to harm and intimidate political opponents. That's what liberals do. The last president, Slick Willy, was likewise embroiled in a myriad of scandals one of which involved the collection of hundreds of confidential FBI files on prominent Republicans, which is as criminal as crime gets. Illegal data collection and criminally abusing political enemies illegally with government agencies is a way of life for the liberal. Now, the news comes out that the NSA is recording all electronic communication on every single person. Some on either side of the political spectrum believe it is vital to our security, some believe it should never be done. One thing for sure, no matter whether it is good or bad, liberals will be sure to use this massive information database in a bad way to harm their political opponents. That is why it is stupid to put liberals in charge, they simply can never be trusted to act in anyone's interest other than their own. CJPOST

New York Pro Business Now

After doing everything possible to drive business away by over-taxing and over-regulating businesses into extinction within its borders, New York is now being advertised as a Utopian business environment and claiming it has cut taxes on families and businesses and transformed itself into a pro-business environment by essentially adopting the conservative approach to wealth creation, cutting taxes on the rich, which they have claimed since time began is evil beyond description. The fact the liberals in charge in New York feel compelled to claim they are now conservatives must surely mean they have screwed things up really bad. Of course, this whole pro-business public relation exercise is a big joke and a lie designed to absolve the liberal of blame when things come crashing down. Afterall, they tried things their way and then tried (or pretended to try) them your way and neither way worked so don't blame them. CJPOST

Closing The Barn Door After The Horse Gets Out

Moore Oklahoma officials applied for FEMA Grants to help provide tornado shelters for themselves and their children to protect themselves from the inevitable, and the inevitable just happened. Problem is, those FEMA grants were never granted. It seems local officials had been complaining for the last year or so about that the application process was basically impossible because of all the red tape and rule changing in the middle of the process our friendly government provided ensuring nothing would get done. So people died in far larger numbers than should have had our government been working to make our lives safer doing real things, not phony ones such as gun control. They would move heaven and earth to fast track a new gun law on the books that all know does nothing while real dangers get ignored. To those still naive enough to believe the new health care law does not include death panels I would quote Hillary's infamous recent quote but re-phrase it a little, "What difference does it make if you die because your government planned it or because it was incompetent?" Ironically, you can be sure politicians will be tripping over themselves now to dump tons of help and money on Moore because now they will get credit and praise for doing good. Unfortunately most of them are rotten to the core, attempting to receive some reward by showing up at the funeral of those whose deaths they could have prevented. cjpost

Please, Don't Insult Nixon

Some are drawing comparisons between Obama and Nixon, asking whether Fast and Furious Gate, Benghazi Gate, IRS Gate, etc, etc, etc, gate, gate, gate, compare to Nixon's Water Gate. To this I say, Please don't insult Nixon by comparing him to someone this corrupt. cjpost

No Jailhouse Rock For Elvis Impersonator

Looks like that Elvis impersonator was turned loose and charges dropped because, whoops, he's totally innocent. How anyone in federal law enforcement makes such a mistake, or how anyone thinks an Elvis impersonator has the ability to produce, handle and distribute some dangerous toxin without killing himself is a mystery. Imagine a man who could not be filmed from the waist down due to his explicit hip gyrations with one leg flopping uncontrollably in every direction while one arm swings around in a big circle with a face contorted into a sneer as sweat pours profusely from his forehead into his eyes working in his lab attempting the delicate task of refining some toxic poison. It could not be done. The feds should have realized this and went after, I don't know, anyone but an Elvis impersonator. cjpost

Lets Decide Now, Not Later

Now that it's fresh on the stupid bed-wetting liberal mind I wonder how they feel about enhanced interrogation techniques now. For example, suppose they find the Boston Bomber but they then find out he was one of a group of a few others who are about to do the same thing around the country and they plan to do it today. Then, lets suppose the little bomber boy they caught has clammed up and refuses to spill the beans, giving names and locations on his fellow serial killers. This is the time, right now, to decide whether we use every method available to extract information from one serial killer in order to save many innocent lives. Once time passes the liberal is able to steer this argument into his hypothetical dream world where things sound good in theory but in practice, not so much. The typical citizen these days has the attention span of a 2 year old with political knowledge to match, and when time has removed emotion, he tends to agree with the ten thousand voices offering something that makes no sense rather than the two or three that do. We should decide right now, while those with short attention spans with fresh emotion are able to pay attention long enough to decide how serious we are about protecting ourselves. cjpost

Background Checks For Everyone!

Instead of doing background checks on someone purchasing a gun, why not do background checks on every man, woman and child in the entire country. If there is any evidence that running a background check prevents a criminal from getting a gun and killing someone, which there isn't, then surely it should be recognized that there must be a lot of frustrated killers out there. Unfortunately no criminal is frustrated by background checks because they obtain their weapon the easy way, stealing one or buying one on the street. With the ability of circumvent the background check with ease we are all in the same danger we were in before we had background checks which those stubborn criminals refuse to comply with. To close this obvious big hole I would ask for the only logical remedy, make everyone, not just gun buyers, but every person in the country submit to a background check once yearly. That way all the people that currently submit to background checks (harmless good people) as well as those that don't and never have (dangerous bad people) will both be checked. If a background check is capable of identifying criminals and prevent them from purchasing a gun then it should be used to identify the same criminals and all the currently unknown criminals as well as those potential future criminals that might get their hands on a gun the way most do now, illegally. cjpost

The Tax Man Cometh and Also He Readith Your eMail

Looks like the IRS is reading everyone's emails now. Three thoughts. 1-I don't have time to read my emails now, I wonder how the IRS finds time to read everyone's in the entire country. 2-How does the typical government worker who spends most of the day watching porn, taking every other day off and apparently about two months behind on the work he/she was hired to do find the time to read other people's emails? 3rd-What are they looking for? Do they hope to catch someone talking about unreported income or possibly catch someone bragging about cheating on his taxes or more likely a porn site recommendation? Someone needs to look into this. cjpost

Conservatives Are Not Racist or Homophobic, Liberals Are

Liberals have to be the most racist, homophobic human beings on the planet. There is what has been called "The subtle racism of low expectations" sometimes called "The soft bigotry of low expectations." Nothing better describes how Obama is viewed by his adoring admirers. The economy is no better than when he took office, it is far worse. It was described as terrible before he took office, now that he's running it, and made it worse, it's described as better. I guess liberals don't expect as much from some people and races and lower the bar as low as it needs to go to call failure a success lest we call someone what he is, a failure, and a very bad one. Liberals are homophobic to the extreme. So fearful of the homosexual not liking them are the liberals that what ever the homosexual demands, the liberal insists they must have, including marriage of all things. Homophobia is not telling the homosexual what you think about him but rather telling him what you know he wants to hear. cjpost

A Time Of Great Leaders

The death of Margaret Thatcher reminds us of a time when we had great leaders. The Labour Party, or the British Obama Party aka liberals, had nearly destroyed the economy in her country but she instituted capitalist policies, cut taxes and beat the unions back and British unemployment fell from 13% to 5%. Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, Regan was doing the same and unemployment in the US fell from 11% to 5%. Both leaders displayed dramatically how superior capitalism is to socialism and for that they had the guaranteed hatred from the left for all time which will never accept any system, no matter how good it is for man, that does not allow the liberal to decide how much men should have and which men should have it. cjpost

They Can Always Beat Us When Giving Other People's Money Away

If the typical American's concern, when considering which party to vote for, republican or democrat, goes no further than picking the one most likely to give him the most, regardless of cost, then the democrat will always win. When you have a group perfectly willing to spend every penny it is given and borrow an additional $17 trillion and no concern over running this number as high as it needs to go to remain ahead of any opposition it is amazing there are any republicans left. cjpost

Some People Just Don't Know Better

One almost gets the impression daddy Kim Jong-il never told sonny boy Kim Jong-un that all the threats to blow up the world were "fake-threats" designed to scare only western liberal retards such as Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton into sending some high ranking emissary to engage in peace talks and guarantees of free food, money and materials in exchange for his promise to back down and not kill us all, which he always did, back down that is. He knew he could not march his army one mile south without being blown off the face of the earth and more than likely never intended to but it is beginning to look like he never had that father-son talk with little Kim explaining that the North Korean Military vs South Korea backed up by the USA is kind of like a couple of BB guns going up against ten thousand M240 Machine Guns, the odds aren't good. So, little Kim seems to think he has the power to do what he says and very well might try it because no one ever told him he can't. It might be time to check Jimmy Carter out of the nursing home and send him over before things get out of control or maybe Dennis Rodman does that now. cjpost

Government Studies Duck Penises, No Really

Looks like the government just spent $400,000 studying duck penises, meanwhile, the IRS spent $60,000 making a couple of Star Trek parody videos. I'm sure Obama and Biden think this a wise investment of our tax payer dollars but I doubt you would find two other people outside of a lunatic asylum, and possibly not even there, that would agree. I can not imagine how stupid one has to be to even consider something this ridiculous. Everyone involved in this unfortunate exercise would better serve their fellow man if bound in a straight jacked locked forever in a rubber room in the afore mentioned lunatic asylum rather than be allowed work in government or anywhere else. cjpost

The Useless People Awards

I guess they had the academy awards last night, an unwatchable freak show of the most useless elements of society patting each other on the back for various incredible contributions to mankind. Actors seem clueless to the fact that normal human beings have noticed their only useful contribution to their fellow man is to entertain and provide clear example of how to not live one's life by virtue of their adulterous, drug abusing, drunken serial marriage behavior yielding the most miserable life possible. They are clearly useful in determining which politicians to not vote for as depravity attracts depravity and if they are for someone it is a safe bet the best choice for us is the one they are against. They are totally oblivious to the fact that their wishes, should they come true, would spell their doom. They accumulate and spend vast sums of wealth while supporting those that profess a doctrine that would not allow for it and support religious and political dogma from around the world that views what they do as totally unacceptable and would put a quick end to it while amazingly hating they own country and the system that makes their lifestyle possible. There is no other profession that one could think of that is more useless and clueless with the possible exception of the politician.

Let's Do More Sequesters!

Obama and the democrats fooled around like a bunch of victorious laughing idiots because they came up with this ingenious plan, the sequester, which would force the republicans to do exactly what they wanted (massive tax hikes & massive additional deficit spending) because the republicans would do anything to prevent the sequester which meant caving to the democrats. At the same time they would destroy the republicans because of all the in-fighting sure to happen in the republican ranks. And now the sequester is upon us which was Obama's idea but will be the republicans fault because republicans and democrats could not reach an agreement on a budget i.e., the republicans refused to do it the democrats way. And suddenly Obama and the democrats don't appear like laughing idiots anymore, it has become clear that the republicans have decided that the sequester is really not a bad idea after all and this whole thing could back fire on the democrats because if people realize you can actually do budget cuts and the world doesn't end then why not do more, and the last thing the democrats want is to cut spending. Since the sequester is only thing that has actually worked to cause this president to cut spending, let's do more of them. cjpost

Things Are Not What Some Believe

It is amazing to watch young folk these days speak to political issues as if they have any idea what they are talking about yet are utterly clueless about that which they speak. It is a center-right country yet they actually believe the exact opposite based on what the president and the news media teach them. Recent Rasmussen polling shows that 35.4% people identified as Republican while 34.0% Democrat and 30.5% unaffiliated. The republicans hold significant majorities of state legislatures and governorships. Democrats can not even get elected without pretending to be more conservative than the republican they are running against and just looking at the recent history of presidential elections this point is abundantly clear. 1980-Reagan defeated Carter (Carter was liberal). 1984-Regan defeated Mondale (Mondale was too stupid to pretend he was not a liberal). 1988-Bush HW defeated Dukakis (also too stupid to pretend he was not a liberal and looked bad in an army helmet). 1992-Clinton defeated Bush HW by pretending to be more conservative than Bush and only because Perot siphoned off a huge chunk of the Republican vote but mostly because Bush was too liberal. 1996-Clinton defeated Dole because every liberal idea Clinton attempted to inflict on the country enraged the electorate so much they threw every democrat out of the house and senate first chance they got at the mid-term elections and replaced them with republicans, then Clinton took a drastic right-turn becoming more right-wing than David Duke and squeaked out a victory over Dole who was too liberal for most Republicans and had little chance of winning anyway. 2000-Bush W beat Gore because they believed Bush to be further right than Gore. 2004-Bush beat Kerry for same reason as defeating Gore. 2008-Obama defeated McCain because McCain is a liberal and Obama pretended to be more conservative than McCain. 2012-Obama defeated Romney mostly for same reason he defeated McCain. This all demonstrates that things are much different than many, mostly young folk, seem to think. The country will in all probability elect a Republican president next time, possibly even a very conservative one, and this will apparently come as a major shock to those that for some odd reason live in the moment and believe things other people of like mind tell them. cjpost

Liberal Gun Grab Doesn't Go Far Enough

Looks like some police officer went nuts in Los Angeles and is currently on a killing spree. That makes the liberal argument that only the police should have guns seem utterly insane. The police have shown no ability to not go nuts and start spontaneously firing their weapon indiscriminately at innocent people than any one else. We should take the guns away from the police along with everyone else, this is the only logical conclusion. And while we're at it the military seem to have a problem killing their fellow soldiers and blowing up buildings when they get home so they should not have access to weapons or training in explosives. Surely they could learn to fight without guns and bombs, things more likely to kill you than the threat they were stupidly acquired to protect against according to the liberal. Sure the gun is more likely to kill you than protect you if you are retarded like the liberal and count suicides, which account for almost every self-inflicted gun shot every recorded in your numbers. Obama said if only it would save one life we should do it when telling us he should be allowed to take our second amendment away and, using this rationale, I call for the police and military to turn in their guns immediately and the speed limit to be reduced to 10 mph. cjpost

Odd Priorities

Number of kids killed at Sandy Hook: 20. Number of kids killed in the US that same day by abortion: 3,000. Percentage of news media demanding that guns be outlawed: 100%. Percentage of news media demanding abortion be outlawed: 0%. cjpost

Politicians Don't Help The Little Guy

Anyone voting based on any expectation of the politician looking out for the little guy is sadly naive. Playing the class warfare game is the easy way to power and money for the politician who is corrupt and lazy and there is an abundance of lazy corrupt politicians. The median net worth of members of congress is $913,000 vs $100,000 for the general population. Congress' net worth has risen 25% since the 2008 recession vs an average 8% drop in net worth of the average American during the same time. About 50% of the members of congress are millionaires vs only 5% of the general population. Many of these defenders of the poor are worth tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars. They take a $174,000 paycheck yearly from you and me. Why? Most of them have more more money right now than you, me and ten other people will make in a lifetime yet they still take our money (poor people's money) to pay themselves a huge paycheck most of us could not dream of ever having. If they cared about the little guy they would say to themselves, "Let's see, I have millions of dollars right now. The people I represent have very little, maybe it's not right to take their money when I have more than I could spend in 10 lifetimes already." They don't do this though because they don't think like this. They are rich stealing from the poor and your money is more important to them than you are. cjpost

Energy Drinks More Dangerous Than Guns!

According to the news, 10 to 20 thousand people are killed yearly by drinking these new high-energy drinks that are loaded with enough caffeine to kill a horse. Why these ever became popular is beyond comprehension but people voted for Obama so people have shown unexplainable poor judgment in far worse ways I suppose. Looks like now you are more likely to die from having an energy drink in the house than having a gun. With far more kids now dying from energy drinks than guns we obviously need Joe Biden to tell us what to do once again. cjpost

McChrystal Fought For But Voted Against Freedom

General Stanley McChrystal has been making the media rounds promoting his book and said something that caused me to lose all respect for him. He stated that he had voted for Obama in his first term but would not say who he voted for the second time around. Anyone stupid enough to vote for Obama is worthy of exactly zero respect. I have noticed he is being talked about as a potential democrat presidential candidate in 2016 if Hillary decides not to run or potentially her vice president pick. If you are a democrat these days you must be of the extreme-liberal persuasion to run for major office as the only ones left in the democratic party hierarchy are those left at the bottom of the looney bin when everyone with a hint of sanity jumped out a long time ago. Come to think of it, McChrystal might not qualify to be the party's nominee. cjpost

Laws Do Not Stop Crime

People always amaze me when they demand a new law after a criminal act has occurred with the expectation that it will prevent or reduce the particular crime that inspired it. The law is not designed to stop, prevent or reduce crime, it can not possibly do that and was never intended to do so. The law is just a mechanism that is used to punish criminal behavior after it has occurred. There is no known way to stop criminal behavior before or during the act other than a counter-force of sufficient strength, properly applied against the threat, after it makes itself known. This means that the criminal use of firearms to harm others simply can not be prevented with a law or new laws. Even if guns were, by law, made totally illegal it would do nothing to prevent gun crime. It would just change the place criminals would obtain their firearms which would obviously be the black market. Foreign sources would be thrilled to make and sell all the guns our criminals wanted to buy, after all, they do it now with drugs. Drugs can't be stopped, who possibly thinks guns could? So, unless we arm sufficient numbers of teachers or guards in the schools we remain sitting ducks with no good solution, only a new law that is not capable of doing anything. cjpost