They Kill Us But We Make Them Do It

The liberal, being intellectually superior to us, because their judgment emanates from theoretical academic reasoning instead of experience and common sense, in an effort to save us from ourselves, remind us frequently of a dubious notion of theirs regarding how we ourselves are often the cause of our enemies behavior towards us. It seems, in the mind of the liberal, we motivate the murderous thugs of the world to kill us when we offend them or their religion so any expression in that regard whether through word, video, picture or cartoon, makes us complicit with them in our own harm. This, "don't make your enemy mad or he will harm you" philosophy is a cowardly way to live and if it is true one could invite harm upon himself through expressions objectionable to one's enemy, then it is likewise true that changing your behavior to conform with your enemies wishes when he misbehaves is equally provocative. If your enemy attacks you, as standard practice, to communicate to you that your behavior displeases him and you change your behavior to conform with his standards, it takes little imagination to know what your enemy will do next time he is unhappy with you. It also mitigates and somewhat vindicates the enemy's actions, both partially absolving him from responsibility, and providing justification for, his actions. Believing you can control others, even psychopaths, by not offending them could be true at times but this timid approach yields only the possibility of success as opposed to the use of force which guarantees success. It establishes an unwritten agreement between you and your enemy that you are willing to negotiate with him for your safety and this signals weakness, along with complicity of cause, of your aggressor's actions. You are, by professing the belief that you played some role in motivating your enemy to harm you, accepting some responsibility for the outcome resulting from the violence you triggered, not to mention, offering recourse, in the form of modification of expression offensive to the aggressor. It should be obvious we are dealing with psychopathic killers who wake up every day planning new ways to kill us and all others different from them. It should also be obvious you are being played when a psychotic killer pretends to be offended by your insults. He obviously wants the cowards among your group and cowards everywhere to believe there is some rationale to indiscriminate, random murder which would be, moderate your response to his behavior, and cowards everywhere play that role superbly. Being offended is a form of asymmetrical warfare designed to change another person's behavior. When combined with a violent temper tantrum it incites fear of recurrence in the minds of those it is directed at. What the cowards of the world who promote a timid response and modification of expression on our part do not seem to understand is, our enemy is not primarily offended by how we act, they are primarily offended because we exist. When one believes he has divine instruction to kill any not like himself, unless you are willing to change not just your expression, but everything else along with it, then you must die. Your name may not be on the top of his list but be assured, it is on the list. The game he plays by attacking those that he can point to and say "he made me do it" is simply the predator biting away at the edges of a large prey that can not be taken down immediately but through a thousand cuts. Long after we stop offending them through expression they will still be killing us because we are not like them. An enemy that wants to kill you must be killed, there is no other way. The "don't make your enemy mad" theory serves the enemy quite well and sadly also serves the liberal politician who shamelessly promotes it as the excuse for their own failure when enemies are left free to kill us at will because we refuse to deal with them properly. cjpost