The Goal Of The Liberal Is Failure, Part 2

In pursuit of the liberal agenda, failure. there seems to be two mindsets at play. One could be termed managed failure, where the liberal plays the part of a doctor and we or the country, is the patient. The liberal in this scenario, is like a doctor who makes his patient sick enough so the patient is always in need of the doctor but not so sick he dies or so sick he looks for another doctor. This is a tricky balancing act and works very effectively to steer the public towards Socialism if done properly. Most liberals understand this so incrementalism, slowly boiling the frog by starting out with cold water in the pot then slowly increasing the heat, is how this liberal mindset attempts to achieve its objective. They seem to understand you should not cause harm or death to their patient, just discomfort and a little measured pain is sometimes acceptable. It could be stated accurately, though some might argue, that the managed failure liberal is not suicidal and would recognize threats to the country at large and fight against them if the alternative caused harm beyond a certain point. Unfortunately, just like religions have their extremist wings, so too do liberals. Hiding among the, let's say, good liberals, are the liberal Jihadists. Their agenda is the same as the moderates within their ideology, it is just they could care less what happens in pursuit of the goal and they want the agenda achieved now, regardless of cost. This explains why so many things harmful to us are allowed to happen, the extremists are in charge, Their agenda is multifaceted with several main objectives, 1-Spend as much as possible and run the nation's debt up as much as possible, i.e., bankrupt the nation so they can claim Capitalism does not work, 2-infuse the existing population with as many foreign peoples and races as possible thereby reducing the percentage of people within the country that are loyal to the country so other agendas are easier to implement, 3-convince the public the law is unjust, including the police, prosecutors, the penal system, etc. so they believe the law is unjust so they will willingly accept new law, 4-spend no time or utter no words telling anyone we are a good country but rather put forth the notion the country is bad not because we are currently bad but because we were bad in the past ignoring the fact we long ago atoned for these sins and did everything possible to correct our mistakes so we are ashamed of the way we are and want to be something else, 5-weaken the military as much as possible so our strength is diminished worldwide reducing our ability to influence events favorable to us, further weakening us militarily and economically. 6-make immorality equal to morality because immorality is predetermined and it is not possible for any person to be anything other than what he is, this strengthens immorality and thereby strengthens liberalism as they are one in the same. One could point to numerous other things in this regard but they can all be summed up as "make sure we are failures at everything." This is why we see so many things happening that make no sense, if we consider these things from the liberals point of view, they make perfect sense. cjpost

The Goal Of The Liberal Is Failure, Part 1

The main goal of the liberal is to weaken America. Once one understands this then everything they do makes perfect sense. People, even very smart people, are often perplexed when the president or any liberal politician in general proposes something with costs greater than benefits ensuring a weaker country after implementation of the policy than what we had before. Fairness is the goal usually professed by the liberal as reason for accepting a weaker country in exchange for the greater good. The conservative believes if the goal is worthwhile, the path to implementation must use methodology which does not weaken the country. The liberal prefers methodology ensured to weaken it. The reason is simple, unless Capitalism fails, Socialism can not succeed. So the liberal spends like no tomorrow, claiming fairness must be wrung from all unfairness everywhere regardless of cost. Reasonable compromise is unacceptable as this is indication of racism, bigotry, oppression and the like. You either do things the way the liberal wants, without compromise, or you are evil. So you must spend and keep spending long after anyone has any idea how, or if, the high cost of liberal ideology will be paid for. The liberal does not care about costs because the goal of the liberal operating within a capitalist environment is failure of that very environment. So, it makes perfect sense to the liberal that Capitalism's credit card must be maxed out, then just increase the spending limit again and again, as many times as you possibly can. Of course all with any sense know that sooner or later bills have to be paid or bankruptcy ensues. When a country becomes bankrupt you have disaster, i.e., Greece. An under educated, uninformed, clueless public, as we seem to have become, tend to believe whatever the politician tells him/her and the very politician that caused its failure points to Capitalism as the cause of the disaster and naturally Socialism is the cure. So the goal of the liberal is simple, destroy the country, break it into little pieces, so they can put it back together the way it should be, their way, without compromise. cjpost

Left Declares Carson Unfit Because He Does Not Want Muslim In White House

Ben Carson said, in response to a reporters question, that he would feel uncomfortable with a Muslim in the White House. The left wing press establishment and democrats in general went bonkers implying with their outrage they had just discovered a bigot of the first order. This is very odd, especially in light of the fact that for the last 30 or so years the leftist press establishment and leftists in general have fought a vigorous anti-Christian war against the Christian religion and any mention or display related to such non-sense. The left has shown discomfort to the extreme as well as what most would characterize as disdain, if not outright hatred, for anything Christian and now they are shocked that someone would be uncomfortable with one whose religion is like Christianity on steroids? Is the left wing press establishment implying they, and all of us, would and should be comfortable with a religion that demands all women be fully covered in public, never speak, never drive a car, not receive an education, receive a beating if seen talking to a man not her husband and stoned to death if found guilty of adultery? Are they saying they would be comfortable with one who believes in the death penalty for homosexuality and the death penalty for all who refuse to convert to his religion. It is obvious what the left is up to with this non-story. The left-wing has added, some time ago actually, Muslims to their group of fake victims for one reason, they are anti-Christian and the left is so focused on destroying Christianity they are willing to align themselves with anyone they view as helpful in that regard. So they, the left, accept any and all Christian haters as fellow bed fellows. The thing they fail to realize is that with some of the groups they have bedded down with, they are going to wake up dead. cjpost

Old People Gun Grab

If you are old and of the "clings to guns and Bibles" persuasion, and have trouble balancing your checkbook, King Obama has decreed you unfit to own a firearm. The King's plan seems best summed up in Rep. Grayson style, "If you are old and find yourself under attack from a thug, die quickly". I would not be surprised if the same dimwits who devised the scheme to require "gun free zone" stickers posted on the doors of all declared unfit for self defense.....cjpost

Shark experts keep telling us how harmless sharks are. Someone needs to tell the sharks that. I'm beginning to think we need a new set of shark experts. cjpost

The Law Is An Ass, Once Again

States that object to the recent Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage should simply ignore federal law and do as they wish in regards to marriage. The precedent for ignoring a federal law one does not like has been established and practiced shamelessly by the liberal and liberal states. Oddly enough, it is the liberal who now describes this practice as unspeakably evil any time conservatives even whisper a hint of the possibility of ignoring federal gay marriage laws. Some liberal states, such as California, ignore federal drug law and federal immigration law and hold themselves up as superior for doing so. If some states are allowed to ignore some federal laws they find objectionable why would others not have the same right? This does not really matter as there is nothing the federal government can do to force a state to comply with any particular federal law anyway. Sure, they could withhold federal funding dollars but it is better to be poor than immoral. They could send federal marshals in to force priests to perform gay marriages at gun point, county clerks to issue same-sex marriage licenses and bakers to bake gay cakes, but the optics would be bad and that is unlikely. The only option for this fiasco seems to be the liberal option of ignoring laws you do not like. cjpost

Banning Confederate Flag Solves Racism

Politicians have solved out racial division problems once again, this time the problem was found to be the Confederate flag. They launched a purge campaign to erase all display and memory of this scourge. Now we no longer have to worry about a skinhead going nuts and shooting people of other races they choose to hate. Thanks politicians. It has been often pointed out that the most racist flag to many groups, Native Americans for example, is the American flag itself. One would assume that any flag flying today that flew in times past when some who flew it were racists would have to go. But the liberal mind does not work that way, they and any flag the declare pure is absolved of all sin simply through good intent. This stupidity has nothing to do with the Confederate flag being a symbol of, and inspiration for, racist behavior because it is not. 99% of those who like having the Confederate flag around do not have a racist bone in their bodies. The possible 1% of racists who do use it to symbolize a racist doctrine have been given exactly what they want, a symbol to unite under, redefined by the politician as racist. Hopefully good people will not let that happen and take back an honorable and historic flag that represents southern pride and lifestyle. The liberals have always hated the south, that is what this has been all about. People in the south cling to their guns and Bibles. They go to church on Sunday, like NASCAR, kill animals and eat them and talk funny. Any chance the liberal gets to remove any symbol of the south you better believe they will take it. Unfortunately there are enough cowards in office on both sides to roll over and let idiots have their way and the only way to undo the damage done is to vote cowards out of office and demand the Confederate flag fly high once again and for any who claim it offends them tell them to get a life. cjpost

Questions Not Asked

Republican presidential contenders are being all forced to answer the question "Knowing what we do now, would you have went to war with Iraq?" I believe it should occur to anyone with the proverbial half a brain that only part of the conclusion in judgement comparison of those who favored war vs those who did not could be drawn if the story were left there as liberals are content to do. Such questions might provide insight into the judgement of one side, when provided with divine knowledge at the onset of an action, but to be fair, we need to also ask the other side to answer a comparable question "Why would you not wage war against any State that provides aid, comfort, means, methods and materials to those intending to kill you by the tens of thousands every chance they get?" Hindsight has shown the main materials, weapons of mass-destruction, were possibly not there, but every expert, every where, assured they were before the war was waged. Another obvious question to ask someone running for president might be "how do you know when to ignore all the experts when making a decision?" We apparently expect republicans to know when all the world's experts are wrong, why should we not expect democrats to have the same ability? We have started down this silly road of hypothetical questions and what-ifs and there is no end to such stupidity. It can not be proven that going into Iraq was a mistake but it is easy to see pulling out the way we have has been a disaster and that might be the purpose of this whole exercise, just ask a few hypothetical questions and hope everyone thinks the other guy is more stupid than you are. cjpost

Low Gas Prices? How'd That Happen?

Gas prices have been going way down since last November, gee, I wonder what happened in November that caused oil futures prices to plummet? Nasdaq.com

The French Should Know Better

Looks like the French are the latest recipients of the ill effects of this perpetual man caused disaster thing. Any country that allows a satirical paper to exist with free reign to publish whatever it wishes regardless of who it offends is just asking for it. It is too bad the French do not have a high ranking government official like our Lady Hillary to promise the families of those affected that we would arrest and prosecute those satirists responsible for this with their publishing things critical of Islam. those not dead already that is. cjpost