The
president in his sermon the other day which could be titled "white man
bad, black man good" told us all to consider how we would feel if the
situation were reversed and Trayvon had shot Zimmerman instead of the
other way around. I have quit wondering which country this poor man was
born in and have been wondering lately what planet he was born on when
he displays this level of ignorance. The answer to his question has been
repeatedly given by myself and a multitude of others until we are blue
in the face. If Trayvon noticed Zimmerman wandering around his
neighborhood and decided to follow him around and keep an eye on him and
Zimmerman did not like it and walked up to Trayvon and punched him in
the face and proceeded to ground and pound him then Trayvon would be
perfectly justified in shooting Zimmerman. I would just as quickly
defend Trayvon's right to defend himself as I would Zimmerman's if the
situation were reversed, which it was, so I do.
We in the real world do not concern ourselves with what color two men
are, we care only what the facts are. The president seems to be
suggesting that if things happened as Zimmerman describes then Trayvon
would have as much right to shoot Zimmerman as Zimmerman would to shoot
Trayvon and this makes no sense whatsoever. Perhaps he is suggesting
things did not happen the way Zimmerman describes because Zimmerman is
white, not really, but sort of. This conclusion flies in the face of all
the evidence and eyewitness accounts, all which agree with Zimmerman's
version of events. So, with no evidence to support his conclusion, the
president proceeds to act in a manner detached from fact and reality
because it suits his racist agenda. cjpost
If
your state does not have a Stand-your-ground law on the books or has
not adopted the Castle doctrine you should demand they do so ASAP.
Despite the fact that liberals are marching in the streets demanding
repeal of such laws, they are simply ignorant of the benefits of such
laws. Prior to their implementation prosecutors went after people who
defended themselves in their own homes and streets because they should
have run away even when they could not. In Florida, blacks account for
about a third of the "Stand Your Ground" claims in homicide cases which
is nearly twice the black percentage of Florida's population. The
majority of these claims are successful with a success rate that exceeds
Florida whites. Oddly, Stand-your-ground had absolutely nothing to do
with the recent Florida incident and the Zimmerman defense team never
invoked it. Like everything else liberals do, if they succeed in doing
what they wish, everyone will quickly wish they had not. cjpost
I
hate to tell everyone stupid enough to believe the initial news media
coverage of the Florida incident, "I Told You So." Well, actually I
don't. But now that the trial is over these easily brainwashed
simpletons look especially stupid, able to be led around like hapless
buffoons, falling for the same trick that has been played out many times
before. I would be willing to bet money that the next time some white
guy kills a black guy that the news media will produce a lop-sided
version of events for public consumption that concludes the white guy
was a murdering racist and the black guy was a helpless victim even as
he sat on top of the white guy bouncing his skull on the sidewalk. Like
pigs at a trough the idiots of this world eat this stuff up. Now, more
than likely the president and the justice department will go after
Zimmerman, charging him with some federal hate crime law. It would be
too good for them to pass up. First, they are racist, Second, it would
make a great distraction from the myriad of scandals which the news
media would ignore as the country debated whether the feds have the
right to imprison an innocent man. cjpost
